The Bone Wars: Paleontology's Greatest and Most Destructive Rivalry
The Bone Wars: Paleontology’s Greatest and Most Destructive Rivalry
In the late 1800s, two of America’s most brilliant paleontologists—Othniel Charles Marsh and Edward Drinker Cope—waged a decades-long war of ego, sabotage, and discovery that transformed our understanding of dinosaurs while nearly destroying both men. The Bone Wars (1877–1892) gave us iconic dinosaurs like Triceratops, Stegosaurus, Diplodocus, and Allosaurus, but at a cost of smashed fossils, ruined careers, and scientific fraud that haunts paleontology to this day.
The Rivals
Othniel Charles Marsh (1831–1899)
- Position: Professor at Yale University’s Peabody Museum of Natural History
- Background: Nephew of wealthy philanthropist George Peabody, whose money funded his career
- Personality: Cautious, methodical, politically connected, and ruthless
- Strengths: Institutional backing, deep pockets, large teams of field collectors
- Weaknesses: Rarely visited field sites personally; relied on others to find fossils
Edward Drinker Cope (1840–1897)
- Position: Independent scientist, affiliated with the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia
- Background: Born into a wealthy Quaker family; largely self-funded
- Personality: Brilliant, impulsive, prolific, and combative
- Strengths: Exceptional scientific intuition; often worked in the field himself; published at extraordinary speed
- Weaknesses: Impulsive descriptions, financial recklessness, made enemies easily
How It Started: From Friends to Enemies
The Early Friendship (1860s)
Marsh and Cope initially respected each other:
- They met in the 1860s and exchanged correspondence about fossils
- They named species after each other (a sign of scientific respect)
- Both were passionate about vertebrate paleontology at a time when the American West was yielding remarkable fossils
The Elasmosaurus Incident (1868)
The friendship shattered over a humiliating mistake:
- Cope described a new marine reptile, Elasmosaurus, but placed the head on the wrong end—on the tail instead of the neck
- Marsh publicly pointed out the error
- Cope was mortified and tried to buy back every copy of his paper to destroy the evidence
- This public embarrassment transformed their relationship into bitter, lifelong enmity
Whether Marsh or another scientist first noticed the error is debated, but the damage was done. The rivalry that followed would consume both men for the rest of their lives.
The War Begins (1877–1892)
The Western Gold Rush for Bones
In 1877, spectacular fossil discoveries in Colorado and Wyoming ignited the full-scale Bone Wars:
- Morrison, Colorado: Schoolteacher Arthur Lakes discovered enormous bones and contacted both Marsh and Cope
- Como Bluff, Wyoming: Railroad workers found a rich fossil site and contacted Marsh
- Garden Park, Colorado: Fossils were discovered near Cañon City
Both men scrambled to secure exclusive access to these sites, beginning an arms race of fossil collection.
Tactics and Sabotage
The competition quickly turned ugly:
Spying:
- Both men hired spies to infiltrate the other’s field camps and report on discoveries
- Workers were bribed to switch allegiances
- Coded telegrams were used to communicate discoveries secretly
Sabotage:
- Marsh’s workers allegedly dynamited fossil sites after excavation to prevent Cope from collecting anything they missed
- Cope’s workers were accused of the same
- Fossils were sometimes deliberately destroyed rather than risk the rival getting them
Claim-jumping:
- Both men rushed to publish descriptions of new species before the other could, sometimes based on fragmentary evidence
- They filed legal claims on promising fossil territory to block each other
- Workers were poached from rival teams with offers of higher pay
Rush to publish:
- The competition drove both men to publish at reckless speed
- Cope published 1,400 scientific papers in his career—a record that stood for over a century
- Marsh published fewer papers but described more species
- Both men described species from inadequate specimens in their haste to beat the other, leading to many names that are now considered invalid
The Public War
The rivalry spilled into the public arena:
- In 1890, Cope gave an interview to the New York Herald accusing Marsh of plagiarism, incompetence, and stealing government fossils
- Marsh fired back with his own accusations
- The resulting newspaper scandal damaged both men’s reputations and embarrassed the scientific community
- Government funding for paleontological surveys was cut as a result
What They Found: The Dinosaur Discoveries
Despite the ugliness of their methods, the Bone Wars produced an extraordinary scientific legacy:
Marsh’s Major Discoveries
| Dinosaur | Year | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Allosaurus | 1877 | Dominant Jurassic predator |
| Stegosaurus | 1877 | The iconic plated dinosaur |
| Diplodocus | 1878 | Classic long-necked sauropod |
| Triceratops | 1889 | The three-horned icon |
| Apatosaurus | 1877 | Giant sauropod (the “Brontosaurus” controversy) |
| Ceratosaurus | 1884 | Horned Jurassic predator |
| Barosaurus | 1890 | Long-necked diplodocid |
Marsh also described numerous other species, including early mammals, pterosaurs, and toothed birds (Hesperornis, Ichthyornis) that supported Darwin’s theory of evolution.
Cope’s Major Discoveries
| Dinosaur | Year | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Camarasaurus | 1877 | Common Jurassic sauropod |
| Coelophysis | 1889 | Early Triassic predator |
| Dimetrodon | 1878 | Iconic (non-dinosaur) Permian predator |
| Dryptosaurus | 1866 | Early theropod discovery |
| Amphicoelias | 1878 | Possibly enormous sauropod (disputed size) |
| Monoclonius | 1876 | Early ceratopsian |
Cope also described numerous fish, amphibians, reptiles, and mammals from across geological time.
By the Numbers
| Metric | Marsh | Cope |
|---|---|---|
| New dinosaur species named | ~80 | ~56 |
| Total new vertebrate species | ~500 | ~600 |
| Total publications | ~300 | ~1,400 |
| Valid species (still recognized today) | ~30 | ~25 |
Many of their hastily named species have since been synonymized (recognized as duplicates of the same species) or declared invalid due to insufficient material. The rush to name species faster than the rival led to enormous taxonomic confusion that took a century to resolve.
The Brontosaurus Problem
One of the Bone Wars’ most enduring confusions involved Brontosaurus:
- 1877: Marsh describes Apatosaurus ajax from fragmentary remains
- 1879: Marsh describes Brontosaurus excelsus from a more complete skeleton—a separate, larger species
- 1903: Paleontologist Elmer Riggs determines that Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus are the same genus. By the rules of taxonomy, the first name published wins, so Apatosaurus takes priority and “Brontosaurus” is declared invalid
- For 112 years: Scientists insisted “there is no Brontosaurus”—it’s Apatosaurus
- 2015: A detailed study by Emanuel Tschopp and colleagues re-examined the specimens and concluded that Brontosaurus is actually different enough to be a separate genus after all
So Brontosaurus is back—but the century of confusion originated directly from Marsh’s hasty Bone Wars naming practices.
The Human Cost
Financial Ruin
- Cope spent his entire family fortune funding his paleontological work. By the early 1890s, he was essentially bankrupt, forced to sell parts of his fossil collection to survive. He died in 1897 at age 56, surrounded by fossils in his cramped Philadelphia home
- Marsh fared better financially thanks to his Yale salary and Peabody connection, but his spending on field expeditions and political conflicts left him in financial difficulty by the 1890s. He died in 1899 at age 67
Destroyed Fossils
The most tragic legacy of the Bone Wars was the deliberate destruction of fossils:
- Sites were dynamited after excavation
- Fossils were smashed rather than left for the rival to collect
- Hasty, careless excavation techniques destroyed specimens that more careful work could have preserved
- An unknowable number of scientifically valuable fossils were lost forever
Scientific Damage
- Dozens of invalid species names created decades of taxonomic confusion
- Poorly documented localities made it impossible to determine where many specimens were found
- The public spectacle damaged the reputation of paleontology as a serious science
- Government funding for paleontological surveys was reduced as a result of the scandal
The Legacy: What the Bone Wars Gave Us
Despite the destruction and personal tragedy, the Bone Wars had enormously positive effects on paleontology:
Before the Bone Wars (pre-1870)
- Only 18 named dinosaur species in North America
- Public awareness of dinosaurs was minimal
- Paleontology was a genteel, slow-moving field
After the Bone Wars (post-1892)
- Over 140 new dinosaur species named (even accounting for invalid ones, dozens are still recognized)
- Public fascination with dinosaurs exploded—museums began mounting spectacular skeletons
- The American West was established as the world’s richest source of Jurassic dinosaur fossils
- Techniques for large-scale fossil excavation were pioneered
- The competitive pressure drove genuine scientific progress, even if the methods were questionable
Museum Legacies
The collections amassed during the Bone Wars form the core holdings of two of the world’s greatest natural history museums:
- Yale Peabody Museum (Marsh’s collection): Home to Marsh’s original Stegosaurus, Triceratops, and Apatosaurus specimens
- Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia (Cope’s collection): Houses Cope’s original specimens and papers
The Deathbed Challenge
In a final act of competitive defiance, Cope reportedly left instructions for his brain to be measured after death—challenging Marsh to do the same, believing his brain would prove larger (and therefore superior). Marsh apparently declined the challenge. Cope’s skull remains in the collections of the University of Pennsylvania.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Who “won” the Bone Wars? A: Marsh is generally considered the “winner” by the numbers—he named more dinosaur species, more of his names remain valid, and he had more institutional backing. However, Cope was arguably the more brilliant scientist, and his theoretical contributions to vertebrate paleontology were more influential. Both men paid enormous personal costs.
Q: Did they ever reconcile? A: No. The rivalry lasted until Cope’s death in 1897. Marsh died two years later. There’s no record of any reconciliation or softening of hostility between them.
Q: Could this happen today? A: Modern paleontology has safeguards that prevent the worst abuses: peer review, institutional oversight, regulations protecting fossil sites on public land, and collaborative rather than competitive norms. However, competition for high-profile discoveries still exists, and debates over naming priority can still be heated.
Q: What happened to their field workers? A: Many of the actual fossil hunters who did the dangerous, backbreaking field work are now obscure figures. Workers like William Harlow Reed, Benjamin Franklin Mudge, and Charles H. Sternberg (who worked for Cope) were skilled paleontologists in their own right but are largely forgotten in the shadow of their famous employers.
The Bone Wars remain one of the most dramatic stories in the history of science—a tale of genius, ego, and mutual destruction that paradoxically produced some of the greatest scientific discoveries of the 19th century. The dinosaurs that Marsh and Cope pulled from the American West—Triceratops, Stegosaurus, Allosaurus, Diplodocus—became the icons that define our image of dinosaurs to this day.